Ugly Doll Invitations

A total madness

Sometimes you have to do terrible things, and I am one half of a dreadful course of ISO 9000 on PMG (do not understand anything, do not worry, thank your lucky not to know, suffice it to say that is horrible).

What horrible enough to keep my sanity I decided to start building (which is actually an old idea, but only now need to devote to that for non-sink) an axiomatic theory for sociology. Imagine how terrible it is that if the above was needed to maintain mental health.

Well, for now, and to show taste, postulates and propositions of the theory (everyone has their 'demo' as an informal, interesting work is to develop a demonstration elegant formal). And without any explanation or comment.

Postulates Postulate I.

• The capacities of the actors are completely defined by being able to learn, communicate, and have preferences
• Postulate II. All capacities of the actors are limited in their power but are limited in their application
• Postulate III. Actor relationships with others are completely defined by its control and interest

Basic Characteristics of the Interaction

• Proposition 0: The field of interaction grows to cover all possible agents (ie no permanent social barriers to interaction)
• Proposition I. Every interaction creates possibilities for new interactions (ie the interest of an actor to coordinate permanent)
• Lema I. All interaction effects and the whole effect is necessarily total unknown actors
• Proposition II (1 st Basic Law of Interaction): The probability of successful coordination ego is proportional to the energy expended by ego and is proportional the importance of the relationship to alter
• Proposition III (2 nd Basic Law of Interaction): In all interactions, the agreement will be differentiated and preferred over disagreement
• Proposition IV (3 rd Basic Law of Interaction): Results of an interaction are not completely controlled by the interaction itself
• Proposition V: The energy order (from highest to lowest) of the modalities of coordination is domination, negotiation, conversion and deconversion
• Lema I: Mobilizing resources requires more energy to mobilize
beliefs
• Lema II: The positive coordination requires more energy than negative coordination
• Proposition VI: All coordination mode suffers a decay process into forms that require less energy
• Proposition VII: Decrease alternatives increases the likelihood of coordination (Schelling Points)
• Proposition VIII: Mobilizing beliefs is more expansive than

mobilize Section II. Network General

• Proposition IX. Autonomous social actors produce networks that are not controllable by a specific social actor
• Proposition X: An ego network is more effective in producing reserves coordination if ego modes of interaction of interest leaving the primary alternative methods using higher energy.
• Proposition XI: The central positions in a network are more stable than bridge positions
• Proposition XII: The sign of the history of past interactions is directly proportional to the future continuity of interaction, but the future continuity of the interaction has no effect on the sign of future interactions
• Proposition XIII: A complex network of relationships produces cohesive groups
• Lemma I. The difficulty of replacing alter depending on the complexity of the interaction
• Lema II. An actor can only hold a limited number of complex relationships
• Proposition XIV: There is no tendency to clustering simple relations
• Lema I. There is no limit to the number of simple relationships that an actor can maintain
• Lema II. In a simple network of relationships alter all are relatively similar to each other
• Proposition XV. A set of actors generate a network with small world topography
• Proposition XVI. A dynamic network is always

Section III. Organizational networks

• Proposition XVII: Organizations are actors
• Proposition XVIII: Organizations can only appear in high-energy social media
Section

IV. Basic Characteristics of Social Practices

• Proposition XIX. The roles that make a practice known by its practitioners
• Proposition XX. Any social practice has requirements for playback
• Proposition XXI. There are no pure practices of domination
• Proposition XXII. Conversion and pure practices are vulnerable
deconversion
• Proposition XXIII. Pure trading practices are associated with simple networks

Section V. Construction of Social Practices

Proposition
• XXIV. (1 st Basic Law of the Social Order): The players automatically generated social practices
• Proposition XXV (2 nd Basic Law of the Social Order): It is impossible for a social practice ensures its reproduction conditions
• Proposition XXVI. The existence of power differentials increases the speed of the process of building practices
• Proposition XXVII: A social practice created a closed network can be extended in an open network
• Proposition XXVIII: An open network destabilizes the process of building practices
• social Proposition XXIX: The development of information-interactional facilitates the construction and deconstruction of social practices

Section VI. Relations between Social Practices

• Proposition XXX. Two or more practices may conflict while still having access to resources that allow the conflict, and conflict does not affect the reproduction of practices in conflict
• Proposition XXXI. Contradictory practice can be maintained if other independent practices generate the resources required for the practice